Ask Emma: Shade-Grown Coffee

Dear Emma,

My customers seem very interested in shade-grown coffee. Why does it matter?! How does it impact the coffee quality? Shouldn’t I just advise them to judge specialty coffee by its flavor?


Shady Business
South Bend, IN

Dear Shady,

There are many factors that make coffee valuable to consumers. Shade matters to some from an environmental perspective; others because they feel it influences the flavor. What do we actually know about these important issues?

The good news is, much research has been done on the ecological and economic impacts of shade-grown coffee. Sadly, there is far less information available on how this influences cup quality. When we hear the term “shade-grown” coffee we many imagine a pristine ecosystem where coffee just happens to be planted and coffee farmer happen to be walking around in the woods picking the beautifully ripe coffee they stumble upon. This romantic vision is rare in the coffee industry. There are, however, varying definitions and variations of forested coffee and agroforestry to consider when thinking of purchasing or promoting such a coffee.

Trees and agroforestry can provide environmental advantages to the planet, and simultaneously in coffee production. Trees act as carbon sinks in the landscape, make oxygen, save water, and provide a myriad of other benefits to the local microclimate and ecosystem. Trees provide the ecosystem with structural and chemical resources. Their roots help prevent erosion. They offer the soil much-needed nutrients from their fallen litter, and certain species can fix nitrogen from the air (Souza and others 2012; Romero-Alvarado and others 2002; Dossa and others 2008; Munroe and others 2015).

Trees act as buffers to the coffee microclimate. That means that they can act as insulators for the understory, where coffee grows. They can both protect coffee from frost as well as cool the microclimate during very warm weather (Souza and others 2012; Santos and others 2012). Another large way that trees regulate microclimate conditions is through holding moisture in the ecosystem, leaving more water in the soil and therefore theoretically available to coffee plants. There is also evidence that tree cover reduces the leaching of nitrogen from the coffee plantation (Tully and others 2012).

There is a large body of literature supporting the idea that when shade is added to a coffee-growing system, the biodiversity of the ecosystem increases (Perfecto and others 1996; Romero-Alvarado and others 2002; Soto-Pinto and others 2001; De Beenhouwer and others 2013; Jha and others 2014). Here we should stop, and remember that biodiversity is an important intrinsic value. It is a choice to recognize and care about biodiversity. While many of us hold this value, the challenge is to quantify the value of it. How much “better” is a coffee that is produced in a highly diverse environment? Our community faces this challenge daily.

What about flavor: can we taste shade-grown coffee? The answer varies depending on the individual situation. What we do know is that generally, the smaller coffee yield under shading leads to fewer, larger coffee fruits. Also, there is evidence that shade-grown coffee seeds have higher sugar and lipid contents than sun-grown coffee, which may increase the cup quality of coffees (Alpizar and others 2004; Geromel and others 2008; Vaast and others 2006; Somporn and others 2012; Marraccini and others 2005; Bosselmann and others 2009). Multiple studies have found that the acidity and body of brewed low-altitude coffee was improved by shading (Muschler 2001; Vaast and others 2010b; Vaast and others 2006). They suggested that a lower growing temperature (provided by shade) produced a more uniform ripening of berries, which led a better quality cup. However, there are also conflicting studies that have found no perceivable difference in quality (Steiman and others 2006; Vaast and others 2010a). What is the problem here? In the end, unless we understand the biochemistry of fruit ripening time and how this directly affects the chemical composition of coffee seeds and link this to repeatable and consistent flavor differences, it is impossible to say with certainty what is going on. That’s right folks—here is another example of why we reach this same conclusion again and again: more research is needed to help fully understand why coffee tastes the way it does!

Unfortunately, there can also be true drawbacks to shade-grown coffee. In many situations, shade lowers coffee yield (Steiman and others 2006; Vaast and others 2006; Morais and others 2006), delays ripening (Muschler 2001; Vaast and others 2006; Ricci and others 2011), and is more labor-intensive to harvest. These are luxuries that not all producers, as people who must balance costs and benefits, can choose. Any value or perception thereof must make business sense. Fortunately, some farms that use agroforestry can benefit from pricing incentives offered by certification programs. However, the reality is, that the value of shade coffee is not always translated into farmer benefit.

Where does this leave us? Certainly, flavor alone is not an indicator of whether or not a coffee was shade-grown. Great-tasting specialty coffee can be produced using many/any/all/unknown production strategies. There are real ecological benefits of shade-growing coffee, and there may be quality benefits too. However, if we seek to support this method of coffee growing, we must recognize and value it for its own sake.

So, Shady, the real question becomes, what is shade coffee worth to you?

Emma SageEmma Sage is the science manager at SCAA, where she promotes research, acts as the primary liaison between science and industry, and serves as a scientific interpreter for coffee professionals. She holds a M.S. in Botany from the University of Wyoming, a B.A. in Ecology, and holds a post-graduate certificate from the Applied Sensory and Consumer Science Certificate Program at the University of California, Davis.


Literature Cited

Alpizar E, Vaast P, Bertrand B. 2004. Fat Content: a Quality Indicator for Central America Coffees? Proc. 20th ASIC. Bangalore.

Bosselmann AS, Dons K, Oberthur T, Olsen CS, Ræbild A, Usma H. 2009. The influence of shade trees on coffee quality in small holder coffee agroforestry systems in Southern Colombia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 129(1–3):253-60.

De Beenhouwer M, Aerts R, Honnay O. 2013. A global meta-analysis of the biodiversity and ecosystem service benefits of coffee and cacao agroforestry. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 175(0):1-7.

Dossa E, Fernandes E, Reid W, Ezui K. 2008. Above- and belowground biomass, nutrient and carbon stocks contrasting an open-grown and a shaded coffee plantation. Agroforest Syst 72(2):103-15.

Geromel C, Ferreira LP, Davrieux F, Guyot B, Ribeyre F, Brígida dos Santos Scholz M, Protasio Pereira LF, Vaast P, Pot D, Leroy T, Filho AA, Esteves Vieira LG, Mazzafera P, Marraccini P. 2008. Effects of shade on the development and sugar metabolism of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) fruits. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 46(5–6):569-79.

Jha S, Bacon CM, Philpott SM, Ernesto Méndez V, Läderach P, Rice RA. 2014. Shade Coffee: Update on a Disappearing Refuge for Biodiversity. Bioscience 64(5):416-28.

Marraccini P, Rogers WJ, Caillet V, Deshayes A, Granato D, Lausanne F, Lechat S, Pridmore D, Pétiard V. 2005. Biochemical and molecular characterization of a-d-galactosidase from coffee beans. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 43(10–11):909-20.

Morais H, Henrique Caramori P, de Arruda Ribeiro AM, Carlos Gomes J, Sei Koguishi M. 2006. Microclimate Characterization and Productivity of Coffee Plants Grown Under Shade of Pideon Pea in Southern Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 41(5):763-70.

Munroe JW, Soto G, de M. Virginio Filho E, Fulthorpe R, Isaac ME. 2015. Soil microbial and nutrient properties in the rhizosphere of coffee under agroforestry management. Applied Soil Ecology 93:40-6.

Muschler RG. 2001. Shade improves coffee quality in a sub-optimal coffee-zone of Costa Rica. Agroforest Syst 51(2):131-9.

Perfecto I, Rice RA, Greenberg R, Voort MEvd. 1996. Shade Coffee: A Disappearing Refuge for Biodiversity. Bioscience 46(8):598-608.

Ricci MSF, Rouws JRC, De Oliveira NG. 2011. Vegetative and productive aspects of organically grown cofee cultivars under shaded and unshaded systems. Sci. Agric. (Piracica, Braz.) 68(4):424-30.

Romero-Alvarado Y, Soto-Pinto L, García-Barrios L, Barrera-Gaytán JF. 2002. Coffee yields and soil nutrients under the shades of Inga sp. vs. multiple species in Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 54(3):215-24.

Santos R, Rodrigues L, Lima C, Jaramillo-Botero C. 2012. Coffee Yield and Microenvironmental Factors in a Native Tree Agroforestry System in Southeast Minas Gerais, Brazil. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 36(1):54-68.

Somporn C, Kamtuo A, Theerakulpisut P, Siriamornpun S. 2012. Effect of shading on yield, sugar content, phenolic acids and antioxidant property of coffee beans (Coffea Arabica L. cv. Catimor) harvested from north-eastern Thailand. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 92(9):1956-63.

Soto-Pinto L, Romero-Alvarado Y, Caballero-Nieto J, Warnholtz GS. 2001. Woody plant diversity and structure of shade-grown-coffee plantations in Northern Chiapas, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical 49(3-4):977-87.

Souza HNd, de Goede RGM, Brussaard L, Cardoso IM, Duarte EMG, Fernandes RBA, Gomes LC, Pulleman MM. 2012. Protective shade, tree diversity and soil properties in coffee agroforestry systems in the Atlantic Rainforest biome. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 146(1):179-96.

Steiman SR, Bittenbender HC, Idol TW, Gautz LD, Jackson MC. 2006. Shade Coffee in Hawaii – The Impact of Light on Coffee Quality. Proc. 21st ASIC. Montpellier.

Tully KL, Lawrence D, Scanlon TM. 2012. More trees less loss: Nitrogen leaching losses decrease with increasing biomass in coffee agroforests. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 161(0):137-44.

Vaast P, Bertrand B, Perriot J-J, Guyot B, Génard M. 2006. Fruit thinning and shade improve bean characteristics and beverage quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) under optimal conditions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86(2):197-204.

Vaast P, Raghuramulu Y, Menon S. 2010a. Effects of Shade Tree Composition on the Coffee Quality in Agroforestry Systems of the Kodagu District, South-Western India. Proc. 23rd ASIC. Bali.

Vaast P, Van Kanten R, Siles P, Dzib B, Franck N, Harmand JM, Genard M. 2010b. Shade: A Key Factor for Coffee Sustainability and Quality. Proc. 23rd ASIC. Bali.